Author
Abstract
By re-placing we try in this study to analyze the linguistic texts with all their levels. For instance، synonyms have many phonological and semantic meanings that should accord with the contexts in which they occurred to communicate what other utterances and meanings do not. Grammatical forms have many meanings; each of which have a semantic function different from the other; the verbal is different from the nominal، and even the verbal one has many varieties according to the tense of the verb or its form whether it is abstract or augmented، and what is the type of this augmentation، or its reason. Then looking at the verb from the view of transitivity or intransitivity، and other types of meanings and functions that may put forward many questions including: why is this utterance is used rather than that? Why the verb is in the past tense and not in present for example? Why is the verb in the passive voice not active voice or vice versa? The same thing applies for the nominal forms; why the active participle form is used instead of the object participle? Or why is this intensive form is used but not that nomen adjectivum? But even why this nomen adjectivum particularly? The same thing is applied to in constructing a sentence whether verbal or a nominal one? The construction of a certain sentence contains lots of variability because of multiplicity of constructions، variability of systems، variability of contexts such as why it is corroborated? Why corroboration is done by this system but not that one? Why demand is done b this system but not that one? Why proteron or hysteron are used here? Why prohibition system is used but not negation? Why interjection is used or oath?
Keywords
)